utusanfLFC :how I wish if the carlsberg logo is not on the front... I'm sure the sale of the home kit in Muslim-majority countries would be substantial. why can't LFC ever learn from Man.U? They got themselves a good telecommunication sponsor and Arsenal + Chelsea got airlines. Why is LFC still parading the alcohol company? Associating LFC to a drinking problem? I can't understand it. At this point, there is a need for DIC to come in and perhaps ratify the issue of shirt sponsor once and for all. Liverpool will find themselves at a difficult situation to sell their jersey in all the Muslim-majority countries. Some might say it won't matter but that would show the level of ignorance of the person when Man.U, Chelsea and Arsenal are reaping benefits from the selling of the shirts. And you think what ever the sponsor won't matter... I'm sorry. It does. Muslim reluctantly wear Liverpool shirts simply because it has a beer company name at the front. so we opted for the non-match shirt... that has no carlsberg at the front or show only minimal of it. Please give it a thought. I'm sure there are many sponsors willing out there that can benefit LFC much much better than a beer brand.
No comments:
Post a Comment